|
|
 |
 |
Geauga Lake coasters may be auctioned off
Monday, March 24, 2008 9:28 AM ET |
contributed by
Jeff
It’s looking as though Geauga Lake’s Big Dipper and two other wooden coasters will wind up on the auction block along with the rest of the park’s remaining rides and equipment. Orlando-based Martin & Vleminckx Rides LLC has been trying to sell the 83-year-old Big Dipper as well as the Villain and Raging Wolf Bobs coasters for Geauga Lake parent company Cedar Fair since November.
Read more from Crain's Cleveland Business.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
So would it be unrealistic to expect the coasters to end up as anything but firewood at this rate? You'd think that if anybody was interested in preserving them they would've put out an offer by now, but it's apparent that's not the case. Worst comes to worst you'd probably either have CF trashing the coasters themselves or letting them sit and rot for a couple decades, though the former seems more likely either way...
|
|
|
They aren't going to sit and rot, they'll be torn down. That land will be used for something, sooner than later. Every moment they own it and it's idle, they lose money. I'm pretty sure you can't burn that pressure treated wood. Although the steel on Villain I would think is worth a great deal of cash.
|
|
Well, if they start the bidding at $100 some one might want them.  Villain is on a fairly flat piece of land and is out and back, you could plop it down almost anywhere, do the track work from scratch and have a brand new coaster. I would imagine a steel structure is much easier than moving an old wooden one. Villain is actually a good candidate for the beach front woodie everyone wants. *** This post was edited by eightdotthree 3/24/2008 11:35:40 AM ***
|
|
|
Sure you can burn pressure treated wood. It'll go up just like any other wood. It might not be 'environmentally sound', but I can definitely say from experience that boards that have been pressure treated will torch just fine.
|
|
|
We all know that the Phoenix was relocated and is fantastic. I'm not sure if Raging Wolf Bobs or the Big Dipper were good enough for anyone to want to try it, but Villian certianly sounds like a good candidate. No, I haven't ridden any of them, just basing this on others' TR's.
|
|
|
My guess is that buying a wooden coaster(or a hybrid like Villain) and then moving it elsewhere would probably cost more than simply calling up Gravity Group or some other company and buying a brand spanking new wooden coaster. With a wooden coaster you have much more parts to number and catalog, not to mention all of the wood that will probably be discarded in the process when it is discovered to be rotted or damaged. My guess is that the ONLY coaster that might have a chance at not ending up as scrap is the Big Dipper, and that is because of the historical value of it. I'll even go as far as saying that even that chance is remote. Expect a mighty big bonfire at the waterpark some night this summer.
|
|
|
Villain would be the easiest to move. It would also be the easiest to dismantle and store, and in accordance with modern sensibilities, it is easily the best of the three rides. Sorry, Big Dipper fans, but the Villain is, by current standards, the better ride. Especially that drop off of where the mid course brake would be if it had one, that part is just like GhostRider. I wonder if Cedar Fair's plan for that one isn't to offer it for sale first in hopes that someone else will pay to take it down and haul it away, second to offer it at auction in hopes that someone else will take it down and haul it away, and third to dismantle the ride and store it, figuring that in the near future it would make a great addition to almost any of their current properties except possibly Knott's (see similarity to GhostRider) or possibly Worlds of Fun (it also has elements in common with Timber Wolf). Raging Wolf Bobs has a number of problems, including a bad reputation and a recent accident. It's potentially a decent ride, and it would be a good addition especially for a smaller park that is lacking a good wood coaster and could put it up for a fraction of the cost of a new ride. But that ride has an awful lot of baggage to overcome, not to mention the lack of an operating train (doesn't Cedar Fair have the original PTC trailers floating around somewhere?) Big Dipper is an okay ride, but quite frankly if I had a choice between saving it or the Screechin' Eagle down at LeSourdsville Lake, I'd rather have the Eagle. --Dave Althoff, Jr.
|
|
|
I can only base my comments on Villain 07' based on what three other people on my trip said plus three members of the No Limits development team. (We ran into them while in line for MF the following evening). The ride suck'eth big time. Once again, it all comes down to those hideous Gerstlauer trains. Did I like the ride when I first rode it in 2000? Yes I did, but I still remember a nasty bump right before the station on one of my two rides. I hit my thighs pretty hard into the unforgiving metal lapbar. We only had one fan of Big Dipper. For the three others of us, it was one and done. The out section was miserable, while the return section was awesome. With some retracking, I think it could be awesome for decades to come. We visited shortly after Raging Wolf Bobs had the accident, so I can't give any feedback on that.
|
|
|
But to move Villain would mean to redo the track work from scratch.
|
|
|
Dave speaketh the truth. I've never cared for any of those rides other than Villain. Six Flags let the track work go to hell, and unfortunately Cedar Fair never made the wholesale repair to the entire ride that it needed. But there were hints of glory here and there in the fixed parts. I remember getting on that thing on media day and instantly feeling it was my favorite wood coaster ever. Granted, I hadn't been on Raven yet, but I was impressed. Now that I think about it, I'm actually really surprised someone hasn't snatched that ride up.
|
|
|
The current issues, and most have been mentioned are all valid from a re-sale standpoint. The RWB, my favorite, does have a bad rep, but it is a great mid-sized coaster, It ran strong well into the last 90's. From 1988-to then, it was worth every penny. When dismantling woodies, you lose the track and up to 1/4 of the wood. I am very suprised the Villian wasn't moved. But, on the other hand, with labor and freight costs, its not a whole lot cheaper to just order a new ride. The Double Loop, another great coaster for the masses, has welded track, and needs someone who can handle a plasma torch properly to dismantle the ride, then do the same tlc when re-assembled. The 'call the ball' today, the Villian will be sold, and the flume, and the giant wheel. I only saw that video link last week, so I don't what is all remaining. The RWB, DL, and Dipper will all have the same fate, unless someone comes forth with at least $250,000-$750,000 in funds to buy, dismantle, transport, and re-build. Thats a low-end figure for a major rides like the RWB or Villian. That's also assuming you can do everything 100% inhouse. I did a proposal on the MB Hurricane, and with a good construction crew in house, the cost was at least $1.5 million. At least. And they sold the trains. Add another $50,000-$250,000. And, as an added punch, most states are leery of allowing 'outside' certified rides to enter their state, especially with a history of engineering or litigation issues. Then, you have the added costs of new trains, new braking, and whatever else the State may suprise you with. Its really a toos up to move a major rides nowadays. Which is a shame, since the Dipper, DL, and RWB are all good rides, and have served Geauga Lake well.
|
|
|
Hell, bring Villian to Michigan's Adventure too!!! I'll take it..*** This post was edited by judgejudy 3/24/2008 5:26:32 PM ***
|
|
|
Take Villian...I don't care about it. Give me BD at Beech Bend!
|
|
|
Ill go with with Jeff. When i first rode Villain it was great and with a little time and money it could be great again. I wouldn't be surprised to see a smaller park buy it at auction.
|
|
|
I still can't understand why they don't take Villain to CP and burn that POS they have now. ChuckBetter yet, Add a block and tear down Racer and put it at KI!*** This post was edited by Charles Nungester 3/24/2008 7:43:39 PM ***
|
|
|
CP has Blue Streak and both are pretty identical. And why put a small ride like BD and put it on a big piece of land. Sorry, not happening.*** This post was edited by Parker17 3/24/2008 8:16:59 PM ***
|
|
|
'cause while villain is a great ride, it ain't purdy.
|
|
|
Villain and Blue streak identical? Phuleeze.
|
|
You'd think that if anybody was interested in preserving them they would've put out an offer by now, but it's apparent that's not the case.
Actually, if I were interested in buying any of them, I'd wait for the auction. Why pay what they were asking if you can low-ball a bid and be pretty certain that no one's going to counter offer? *** This post was edited by kpjb 3/24/2008 10:26:13 PM ***
|
|
|
I would gladly trade Mean Streak for the Villain (hey it already has a western name and logo too) if that ride joins the "great amusement park in the sky" it would probably be my highest rated coaster to do so.
|
|
|
eightdotthree: Not surprisingly, Jeff and Agent Johnson both caught what you didnt: When you move a wood coaster, you have to completely re-track it. Given that almost all of the Villain's problems can be traced back to (a) Gerstlauer trains, which Cedar Fair already said don't come with the ride, and (b) worn-out track work, which has to be re-done anyway. Agent Johnson brings up some interesting points about the engineering, and again that gives fairly major advantages to Villain and Wolf Bobs, mostly to Villain, just because of the documentation that ought to be available. I guess to put any of those rides up, someone has to stand behind the engineering. But getting a PE to sign off on the ride ought to be the easy part. --Dave Althoff, Jr.
|
|
|
What's the deal with Double Loop?
|
|
|
bholcomb.......yes, pressure treated wood will burn just like any other wood, but i think what Jeff meant was that it is ILLEGAL to burn it......which it is.
|
|
|
Arrow Dynamics welded the track when the DL was built in 1977. Actually, the welder was a man named John Lane, who also built the Loch Ness Monster. The DL was built to precision, and is a good ride, but it is aging. Adding new trains with lap bars, tunnels, and other items, and you have a great ride with a 42' height requirement. But, the welding, in leiu of bolting, was the way to go then, and the track has lasted. Good then...bad now.
|
|
|
I agree that the Villain is definately worth saving. I also think that Big Dipper is worth saving. Villain should go to a park that is not to far from GL to save on costs of moving the coaster. A small park like Darien Lake or Seabreeze or even possibly Kennywood would be good homes for that coaster. Big Dipper should end up at a smaller park like Kenobles where it would fit right in with all the history that exists on those wooden coasters there. Big Dipper is a good ride, just not a mjaor draw for a major amusement park. RWB was and still is a terrible ride. That should turn into a bonfire very quickly. If CF does not sell all of the coasters, or they do not get auctioned off, BD and Villain may show up at other Cf parks in the near future. Villain could easily go along the beach at CP over by WT.
|
|
|
Once the Norton contracts are signed, and a reserve price is set, CF no longer has ownership. If the reserve, if there is one is not met, CF can decide to accept or not accept any bids. Basically CF doesn't care by now who buys the rides and where they go. Would it be utopia to see them all at other parks? Yes. Will it happen? No.
|
|
|
^^It's a matter of opinion, but RWB was a much better ride after the retracking. It didn't have a whole lot of air, but it had some nice turns and surprises. And compared to its former reputation, it was butter smooth. A great first woodie for kids. I was looking forward to taking my daughter on it last year, but the accident occurred early in the season, and she didn't hit 48" until September.
|
|
|
For $2.5 million dollars, Funtime got bang for the buck. The ride, loosely modeled, upgraded all the hard transitions that the Bobs was notorious for. Coasters of today have to appeal to the masses, and somewhere that was forgotten with certain fans. Anyway, the RWB, with a pretty whacky marketing campaign in Pittsburgh show a wolf in the mountain snow did peak interest, and gave the revenue needed for the next project at Darien Lake, the Predator. Also, the RWB, in additon to being a link to a greater bygone era, allowed GL to begin the rebuilding of the long overdue Dipper. If for some reason the Dipper was delayed into the operating season due to re-construction delays, the RWB was available to woodie fans. It was a good, fast, smooth ride when it was running at top form. No one can take that away. And, it didn't intimidate riders who were just tall enough to ride. Its the same reason the Blue Streak at Cedar Point is so popular against the Mean Streak. Its just plain fun. Dinn did a bang up job. I will miss the Raging Wolf Bobs. Glad to have rode it in 2004. I always thought it would be around for many years to come.
|
|
|
I first rode RWB in 2003, way after its glory days. It was better in 2004 or 2005 when we went back to the park. I assume the other main problem with DL is the fact that it wouldn't make much of an impact at a park unless it was in the middle of nowhere (as Libertyland's Revolution will probably end up being a good addition to DelGrosso's.) DL is actually one of my favorite Arrow coasters because it's smooth and fun. I'd take that thing over any of their mega-loopers from the 80's/90's.
|
|
|
Who says they wouldn't buy another looper in better condition?
|
|
|
|
|
Is there anyone out there to keep these coasters in their same locations? Due to cedar fair's greed the rides might be in danger of being demolished [ sorry if that is harsh to you] though I think that cedar fair doesn't care about history just money and their main park, Cedar Point.
|
|
|
Double Loop isn't even an interesting ride by today's standards. It had its day, but beyond nostalgia I don't think it has any value to anyone beyond the price you could get for scrap. And hey, Cedar Fair can have some spare Arrow looper trains.
|
|
|
^I liked DL because it has a layout that I never experienced before on an Arrow looper. You get a nice pop of airtime in the front seat after the second loop. It's much better then the standard Arrow corkscrew.
|
|
|
Yeah, I agree. It honestly isn't nostalgia for me, I never went to GL until the early 90's. I realize it isn't the most exciting ride out there, but for how old it was, it was always very smooth (did the welding over bolting help this?) and it was a fun little ride. I'd liken it to a Pirate ship. They're old and everyone's gone on a flat that's more interesting and exciting, but they're still solid, fun rides.
|
|
|
DL is nice for kids who see it as a big thrill and their first looping coaster. Twistercoasterman, CF may be the ones to close the park, but do you honestly think Six Flags was going to continue to run the park for a loss?
|
|
|
^^ It was a little nostalgic, but still a fun ride despite the fact that it was an old steel coaster that survived. I liked the airtime hill and the back-to-back loops at the end of the ride were quite enjoyable.
|
|
|
Sounds like it's time to accept any reasonable offer rather then let them rot or be torn down.
|
|
|
I'd agree. The steel coaster and Villain could bring in some cash by recycling/scrapping it. The wooden coasters are more than useless, though. Not only won't they bring in a penny, but they'll cost a good amount to tear down and haul away. If someone offered them one dollar for Dipper and Bobs, I imagine they'd accept it just to save the teardown costs.
|
|
|
The City of Aurora should bid on the two newer wood coasters and whatever else is for sale in the park. The Senator who wrote Dick K. a letter requesting the Big Dipper to be saved should help secure State or Federal assests for historic preservation to use for bidding on the Dipper which in turn should be donated to Aurora under contingency of operation and preservation. Once they've secured ownership of the rides, Aurora can use emminent domain to redevelop the blighted property, which contains their newly purchased assets, into a new amusement park. All they need to do is declare the remaining eyesore (shuttered gate area of the real Geuga Lake park) as a redevelopment zone - it's perfectly legal and used as a tool by municipalities throughout the nation to stimulate economic development. All three coasters and the park were fantastic - the only problem with the place was the last owner bought it to drive it into the ground to eliminate competition for it's more expensive nearby property.
|
|
|
Unfortunately, what you say really can't happen in the compressed timeframe. Reguardless of what the current owners did and did not do, its their property. CF has paid the taxes, paid the help, and paid the bills. No way there to step in for current fiscal business.The rides are 'operational', and ready to go. No condeming can happen. The entire property is maintained. There is no blight. The only real guilt that CF has done is eliminating jobs, which will be equated by new housing. Construction jobs are better than ride ops. On paper. Aurora, if not Solon, may or may not have had an agreement with Six Flags to do this or that when they agreed to move the road, but that would have been swept under the rug by now. Back to Aurora. They could have offered tax incentives, as the townships could have down, to at least show they wanted kids working, and local vendors to have business. None of that matters to CF. What will happen is this: Come next summer, from the Streetsboro exit off the turnpike to Rt43 to Portage Road or where ever the Sea World parking lot is, there will be lots of less traffic. Everyone will feel it, from Perkins to Bob Evans to Holiday Inn to Bang Bang Fireworks. Once the tourism boards realize most of the group business went to Waldameer, Kennywood, and Conneaut Lake Park, which has some intersted parties doing the math as you read this, they will realize they got the screw. Prepare for the knee-jerk reaction, which will include a hefty increase of the amusement tax on waterpark admission to 'Wildwater Kingdom', since the name Geauga Lake will be dropped for 2009. By 2011 or 2012, wave goodbye. All started by Busch, then on and on. Once nice Aurora, with plenty of jobs for the neighborhood kids, could in theory look like the Euclid Beach area. Ugh.*** This post was edited by Agent Johnson 3/28/2008 8:53:42 PM *** *** This post was edited by Agent Johnson 3/28/2008 8:55:09 PM ***
|
|
|
It's actually not too late and the property does not need to be blighted - it's using eminant domain similar to the way a County or DOT can come into your area and has the legal right to toss you out in the name of a new roadway, as long as you are paid the fair assessment value of your property - towns in NJ and OH have taken over some nice-looking, still occupied middle class residential neighborhoods in the name of declaring them redevelopment zones. It's not fair, but it's a tool that has been used and abused by municipalities and higher courts have upheld their rights in both cases in those States. Coasters with no trains are not operational - it's similar to the way a town can take an abandoned department store which has no economic activity left and use eminant domain to redevelop the lot. All it takes is a zoning change to redevelopment by the zoning board and subsequent adoption of a resolution by the City council - they can wrap that up easily before the auction. If they are concerned about the drop in tourism and loss of their beloved 120-year old local park, they should be coniving this strategy already. The key is to having enough funds to outbid others on the coasters, but I think only the Villian will be bid competatively - chances are slim anyone will bid on the other two woodies during a recession, except for maybe the mechanical parts. No one has come forward to purchase the Villian yet because they know a bargain auction was going to be the next logical step and they can get it for 1/3 the asking price - look how cheap the stuff at Wyandott Lake went for. Once they own the coasters they will likely be given a decent amount of time to claim it from the property, so they'll have a little more time to get the property taken over. All they need to do from there is find someone to completely manage the place or call West Chester County to gets some tips on running an amusment park with coasters. They'll have plenty of seasonal jobs back and can focus on turning the park back into a great local traditional park (and competing with GLWW Kingdom to boot!)
|
|
|
Again, they have to have a plan, and I don't think one exists. CF has every right to get top dollar for the land. If was simply closing the Aurora Farms Outlets for example, it would be a different ballgame. While jobs are lost to be replaced by housing, development would go on. There is nothing bad here. Its a business decision. Yes, its a decision that is hurting a lot of emotions, including mine. But, as an industry person, this is what happens. CF is not going to allow that to happen without a fight, and I would think it is too late for anyone to do that. Entire Crawford County is spinning now on what to do to Conneaut Lake Park, an entire county. For GL to be saved, you would need the State of Ohio to show up Monday and purchase the entire property. Thats about it. CF even oews the name, so what would you call the park? As for West Chester County, that system works for some summers, and some that don't. They haven't made solid profits since Marriot left decades ago. Every winter, they need to get more money for the county to 'buy out' leases to take ownership of attractions to add to the bottom line, which, to this day, has been unattainable. I just think that all of this has happened way to fast for Ohio to put the brakes on. Cedar Point's sound business and operating strategies have allowed them to grow, and in the process, they have ko'd about a dozen other parks, who were not as sound. Its just business. Park owners do not want other parks around. Its sad, but true. Its all very sad, including my lost memories, but I still love the business and my co-workers. I don't have to agree to what all the owners want, but I don't have the bucks to buy all those rides and move them myself.
|
|
Is it too late to mourn some more?
|
|
|
It's probably true they aren't coming to grips with how to stop this corporate giant from raping and pillaging their local history, and they probably don't have the wherewillall to want to deal with it, I'm just saying that is what they should do. Once a municipality uses eminant domain to obtain a property, they only need to pay fair assessed value, not market value, so it has nothing to do with having every right to get top dollar - based on the corporate greed involved here and the way they did not give people a warning to come visit one last time, I couldn't disagree more - they do NOT deserve to get top dollar for the land anyway since they bought it with the intention of closing the ride park all along. It's a nice way for Aurora to stick it back to Cedar Fair for the way that company misused and mismanaged the property. Since U.S. Senator Brown from Ohio has already taken the effort to address his concerns in writing over the potential loss of the Big Dipper, I wouldn't rule out the possibility of the State taking the property using historic preservation funding, he may even be able to secure a federal grant for some of the funds if a case could be made that the Dipper has national significance. The intent of Playand was never to turn a major profit. I was created in Rye as a diversion for the benefit of the residents of West Chester County. It's still a great and affordable place for a family to spend a day - if they wanted to make a large profit, they could easily double the price of everything there (except parking) and it would be comparible to prices at the larger chains, however that would be defeating the purpose of why it was built in the first place. Cedar Fair is no longer a company that recognizes and respects it's own roots within the amusement industry - it has become everything that went wrong with Six Flags during it's acquisition and greed frenzy. The CF from twenty years ago would never have the audacity to close Geauga Lake permanently. I once had great respect for the company and their business strategies, but that is long gone since the Dorney takeover. Even a big company like Disney has better ethics - it's time for a change in leadership at CF. I went there this summer for the first time in a while and was appalled at how much worse the customer service has become at the place, including the hotels - and I never thought it was that good in the first place! They should be glad their even getting flat attendance figures based on the way they treat their guests. You pretty much summed it up - it's sad.*** This post was edited by Rye.D.Ziner 3/29/2008 11:28:54 AM ****** This post was edited by Rye.D.Ziner 3/29/2008 11:33:15 AM ***
|
|
|
Wow, that's a lot of drama in those posts. "Raping and pillaging?" Please. What is all this crap about corporate greed? Shutting down a failing business isn't greed. What universe are you guys living in? All of this nonsense about their roots in the amusement industry... what does that even mean? That somehow amusement businesses aren't obligated to be profitable and accountable to their investors? And by the way, Aurora doesn't care what happens here, because the part that closed is not in Aurora. Furthermore, if that community really cared, they would've been visiting the park. All of these hurt feelings, and chalking them up to distaste for capitalism, are at odds with the financial reality that these are in fact businesses.
|
|
|
^Corportate greed has indeed become a redunant phrase, however a visit into their museum at CP shows how they once acknowledged and appreciated the process and some preservation of their past - I wouldn't be surprised now if the current mentality of CF board levels it to build an ATM and soda machines in it's place. Disney is a large corporation in the amusment business who are similarly accountable to shareholders, however they are more responsible and respectful of the amusement business in general - in their US theme park markets they have never bought a park to eliminate their 'competition', even though they have had the opportunity to do so with both B&B and SFMM. If you don't think those were contenders for a tourist's desire to stray outside the Disney magic boundaries for a day, just look at Animal Kingdom and MGM which were built to compete with nearby similar parks, and DCA which is like a combination of USC and KBF. Of course a business will fail if you rape the attractions out of the park. All this nonsense about 'we don't do animals' during the CF purchase was a ploy to relocate the waterpark and eventually close the ride park. What was that tiger show doing at CP all those years along with the Oceana stadium? Obviously they 'did' animals at some point, and they could have just rehired the professionals who had previously been taking care of the animals all those years. Removing the animals was an intended fatal flaw and they pillaged the area into a stark and cookie-cutter waterpark, then pillaged the great waterpark on the ride side into an abandoned eyesore. Regardless of whether the ride side was taxed by Aurora, I'm sure they care about the potential loss of tourist dollars on the businesses in their limits - if not, they will care soon when some of the area businesses close and leave behind abandoned sites. I'm sure many locals still visited the park, however the population of the area represents a drop in the bucket for their larger market of Cleveland, Youngstown, and Akron/Canton, so it's not even relevant. It's not about distaste for capiltalism - the bottom line is that there should be antitrust laws in place to prevent transactions such as Busch buying B&B, and CF from buying GL - capitalism in it's best form should create competition, not the opposite. GL could easily have 'prospered' under a different owner who recognized the need for a less expensive alternative to CP in that economically challenged area of NE OH. If CF was prevented from purchasing GL in the first place under such needed antitrust laws, it would have likely remained open for another hundred years or more. Even the last ticket price of twenty-something bucks was way too expensive for that market - a wristband POP ride option is the best way for a successful park in that area. That's why Busch couldn't profit enough up there to justify continuing their presence, because you can't do that option in a park with so few rides, and the more they increase their gate prices the fewer numbers came.*** This post was edited by 3/30/2008 4:29:58 PM ***
|
|
|
Yeah... that's perfectly logical. They wanted the park to fail so they could just do a water park, which will generate less income than a full amusement park would. Makes perfect sense.
|
|
|
"Geauga Lake will be more of a waterpark, and maybe we'll let the coaster enthusiasts head over to Cedar Point." - Dick Kinzel, spring 2007, Plain Dealer interview.
|
|
|
You think he had a choice in that? Are you saying they wanted to make less money?
|
|
|
No, I'm saying that as early as the beginning of the season 2007, Dick Kinzel knew that Geauga Lake was going to be a water-park only attraction -- or at least primarily so. And that he expected that a large number of former Geauga Lake customers would go to Cedar Point instead. And that the local water park fans (who primarily wouldn't be going to Soak City anyway) would still remain customers, with a substantially reduced park overhead. A financially winning proposition, to be sure. To me it doesn't sound like he closed the ride side to make less money, but to make more.
|
|
|
^He's right: the whole thing was ruthlessly planned from the initial takeover purchase, always suspected (especially while shipping off coasters to other parks), and now obvious from the unceremonious sudden closure of the ride side of GL. Closing the ride section forces that market to seek coaster thrills at CP at double the price, and possibly get them to stay over a night in one of their overpriced hotels. They can control any overcrowding at Soak City by maintaining a waterpark at GL - keeps less people off that little road around the park perimeter and possibly expand some of the SC parking lot into another hotel site. If someone is just going to do water rides for the day, they'll more inclined to settle for GL now since the waterpark has been expanded to be comparible to Choke S*itty. The whole sinister scheme I'm sure seems like a great kill for CF shareholders, however in the grand scheme of things, totally worthless in terms of bringing more gate attendance figures to CP, and in the process cuts the throat of a great piece of amusement park history in Ohio and means a lot less jobs and tourism for the GL area. Overall a dispicable action - I wouldn't be suprised if they clubbed all the seals before shipping them off the Sea World side of the property! Watch in amazement as attendence figures in CP remain flat as gas prices surge and Northeast Ohio residents head to cheaper options like Columbus Zoo, Kennywood/Sandcastle, and Waldameer! The minor surge in CP attendence numbers they are expecting from the GL fallout will not likely transpire, and instead of maintaining those profits from the ride side of GL, their competitors will now see the lions share of those dollars. I'm sure the waterpark left at GL will still have decent attendance numbers, but like CF already acknowledged, people don't carry their wallets on waterslides.*** This post was edited by 3/31/2008 1:50:09 AM ***
|
|
|
It may seem that Gl will be a waterpark but, The waterpark won't probably last a year because people won't drive out to Aurora for a waterpark. I think six flags handled the park better than CF due to the animal side,the water park ,& rides. Cf took thngs out and destroyed the park NOT Six Flags. Six Flags Added rides and attractions,so cedar fair was mean't to close the park and not save it like six flags did. that's my opinion.
|
|
|
I give the waterpark at least a couple of years before CF decides it's not profitable enough to continue - unfortunately, like classic GL, they will not sell it to another company to run it as waterpark since it would be competition for Soak City, and possibly even CP if the new owner started adding dry rides. Instead, I predict they will move the water rides to Kings Island to expand that waterpark in an effort to eliminate The Beach directly across I-71, along with rebranding it Soak City South and 'adding' a new gate directly from the parking lot - they'll use the massive expansion of the waterpark as the excuse to eliminate that section as a free themed area of Kings Island.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|